I have seen a claim (on FMB) that one person can see more with build 489 than he could before. I've also seen claims that the noderefs that are available to a transient node behind a NAT "firewall" are different from the noderefs that are available to a non-transient node tunneling through a NAPT "firewall". So, I *think* freenet is sort-of split by default. Hard to prove, though.
I still think that some warning/discussion on the freenet-dev list was warranted, since I don't normally keep track of the #freenet irc channel. For instance, what network is #freenet on? Why isn't that on the freenetproject web site in an obvious place, such as the "Developer" area "About This Site" section, or the FAQ? I wouldn't even know that #freenet exists, apart from listening on the developer mailing list. _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
