On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 03:28:51PM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote: > >From Gianni Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [...] > >> > or maybe something like this since DBR's can have periods shorter than 1 > >> > day. > >> > > >> > /__DATE__YYYYMMDDHHMM/SSK%40rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE// > >> > >> It's ugly. Really really ugly. > >I don't think it's ugly or I wouldn't have suggested it. However if you are > >willing to implement it, I don't care how you do it as long as you don't > >change the anonymity filter. > > > >You do probably want minute resolution for the DBR time though. > > > >--gj > > Didn't we go over this some months ago? I'm having trouble finding it in the > archives (or even reasonably complete archives at all), but I thought there > was agreement on something along the lines of > freenet:ssk@40rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/[YYYYMMDD]TFE// > > I'm not sure about what sort of format we wanted between the brackets, I was > in favor of just using a java port of getdate (which I have laying around here > somewhere) but I don't know if that went over well or what. We have implemented /SSK@blah/blah?date=YYYYMMDD[-HH:MM:SS]
([] meaning optional) - a very rigid format, but not a difficult one to write or to parse. Hopefully we can just unblock ?'s, and this will just work (or we could only allow certain safe parameters to relative links, ?date being the main one). > > -- > Benjamin Coates > -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Looking for $coding (I'm cheap)
msg03790/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
