On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 09:15:28AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Matthew Toseland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> > 72MB of physical RAM? Uh, in a third world country or something?
> 
> As I told you once in IRC, one of my Freenet nodes is running on a
> machine with 64 MB.
> 
> What I haven't told you is that my *third* permanent Freenet node,
> the one at work that will be going away soon when we get NATted,
> is on a Win95 machine with 32 MB.  (Or at least I think it's 32.  I
You do actual work on it as well as run a freenet node? Doesn't it slow
it down horrendously?
> haven't checked lately and I might be misremembering.)  Yes, Win95.
Yeah yeah, I'm familiar with win95 (two of my users dual boot 95 for
games, NT4 for work and linux for playing with). :(. Been trying to 
get them upgraded to 2K for ages. But those machines have a quarter gig
plus of RAM.
> Not 98, or ME, or NT3, or NT4, or 2k, or XP.  But thankfully not 3.1.
> 
> I'm not sure whether you consider the US a third world country.  I
> think secretly you might. ;-)
:). They have cheaper white market computer components than anywhere
else on earth though.
> 
> -- 
> Greg Wooledge                  |   "Truth belongs to everybody."
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]              |    - The Red Hot Chili Peppers
> http://wooledge.org/~greg/     |

-- 
Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/

Attachment: msg04857/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to