On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:42:35AM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On October 31, 2002 04:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi > > > > The latest build 527 (the version ending .3) seems to be having a field day > > with my processor. Any background application that can eat 100% of a 2.8GHz > > CPU pretty much constantly is a bit beyond me, it's just too much - the > > load on my poor node is way over the top esp with CPU usage to Normal. > > > > Bandwidth limiting features don't seem to stop my node eating 100kbps which > > is far more than I can allow on this particular machine. > > > > Connection limiting features aren't stopping me having over 50 active > > connections at a time (in extreme cases) even though I really can't sustain > > that many on this machine. > > > > Any help/fixes in future versions would be appreciated - running Win XP and > > another machine on NT which is also max'd out 90% of the time. > > > > Can we get an idea of the status of the donations fund and how much is > > required to keep Matt on among other things? It's very important to me that > > development snowballs and doesn't start to crumble. > > Yes! Please fix the cpu issue. On my 400m k3-II builds over 525 are deadly. Um, I'm quite amazed that you can run fred on that _on a good, non-overloaded day_ :). > I am using 525 now - later builds slow down my box even with freenet at nice > 19. On top of that fproxy will not respond. A suggestion might be to use Yeah, the fproxy-stops-responding-at-high-load issue is interesting... > a higher java priority for work generated by fproxy. > > Ed Tomlinson
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/
msg05081/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
