On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 06:46:48AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote: > fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I';ve gotten a few messages now like this one: > > > > "I also note that there were 6 blocks (the last of which is all zeros) > > and only 3 check blocks. For a 50% redundant FEC, shouldn't there be as > > many check blocks as there are normal blocks? Or do I understand it > > wrong?" > > > > So given that I'm sick of answering them, I was wondeirng if I can avoid > > wirting more documentation by having a page explaining this that already > > exists that I can link to > > > > - fish > > You can avoid writing more documentation. One solution of mine is to > answer a question in exchange for the person whom I helped putting the > question and answer in the documentation. It allows people to give > back to the project in a needed way and cuts down on the number of > questions needlessly asked. You could add it to the FAQ? > > Thelema > -- > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raabu and Piisu > GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7 84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB > > _______________________________________________ > devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/
msg05360/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
