Matthew Toseland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I don't personally think it is worth it. Modern distributions > should/will come with LVM out of the box, and you don't need to do > anything drastic (other than a kernel upgrade) to use it anyway. It's > not a priority. But if you really want it, code it yourself.
Heh, in Java? No. :) At the time I wrote the message to which you replied, I hadn't yet seen the proposed symbolic link solution. I think that's sufficient for those who can't handle LVM. -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ |
msg05373/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
