On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 06:24:50PM +0100, Anonymous wrote: > the base question: > >> rtMaxNodes=300 > >> rtMaxRefs=150 > >> > >> or defaults? (both=50) > > > We don't really know. The motivation for decreasing rtMaxRefs was to > > give new refs a chance - if there are too many refs per node, then new > > refs will be swamped and never do anything. The motivation for > > decreasing rtMaxNodes was rather dubious - an attempt to reduce the > > > We don't know. We need to simulate. Volunteering? :) > > Yes, I do! (and hope many others!) > I've lot of bandwith, and 512MB ram. > my cpu is a P2at350, so it's always near 100% of cpu-usage. > in freenet config I've put 300 as maxthreads. > > > average hop time, which was ridiculous because with 120 threads we can > > only keep 48 connections open, so every single request was causing a > > connection restart. > > mh, so with 300 threads I could do 228 connections? (300-72) > is it enough? :) No. With 300 threads it would be 300*0.4 = 120 connections.
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03 http://freenetproject.org/
msg05672/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
