On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 12:06:53AM +1100, fish wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 05:04:45PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:54:07AM +1100, fish wrote: > > > i'm sure we could have a long and protracted flamewar over this, so i'm > > > going to try and skip that by saying that if someone gives me a really > > > good reason to implent RTSP, i'll do it, but the reason has to be > > > something other thawn "rtsp is what you use for streaming" > > > > I don't care whether or not we use RTSP, I only started talking about it > > when Matthew mentioned it. Provided that whatever protocol we use is > > brain-dead simple and generally supported, I don't mind at all. What > > protocol did you use in your python code? > > Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you did ^_^. Anyhow, the code i have right > now uses http for streaming locally (implemented using python's > BaseHTTPServer class). The nice thing about http, is everyone agrees > on it. Well, if it's _that_ simple, maybe we should put it into fproxy. > > - fish
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03 http://freenetproject.org/
msg05999/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
