On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:34:46PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 05:30:46AM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Monday, 20. January 2003 05:05, Andrew Rodland wrote: > > > > > If any of these images use transparency, forget it. > > > Mozilla is virtually the only browser that handles transparent PNGs in > > > anywhere near a correct manner. > > > > I think in my previous mail I said that Internet Explorer 6.0 handles the > > transparent PNG files as well as it did handle the GIF files - probably due > > to the fact that we only have 1-bit transparency in our files. IE can > > handle that. It fails with a real 8-bit alpha layer, though - agreed. > > > > > > > Internet explorer handles them particularly badly; > > > > Not in this case. > Besides, I think everyone, their cats, and dogs agree nobody should be > using Internet Explorer with freenet. Indeed. F*ck internet explorer. Anyway, we've established that IE works for PNGs as long as you don't use more than 1 bits alpha, and we don't. So there is no problem - mozilla does it, what about konqueror? Opera has some of the same bugs that IE has... that's probably about it. Konqueror definitely has support for PNG, I'd be very surprised if it didn't support 1-bit-alpha. > > > Tim McGrath
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/ypDKFmTMOJY/ ICTHUS.
msg06326/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
