On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 08:13:30PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 03:22:10AM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Any objections? Suggestions for improvements? Security isn't a major > > issue because they'd have to go through freenetproject.org to get the > > binary... > > Well, we could extend the current build number mechanism. If you spot a > node with a higher build number than yours, you can request the > description of the improvements since your version. > > To be honest, though - many of the improvements we make between builds > are not likely to mean anything to most of our users, so why not just > say "New build available, upgrade if you can" - which is practically > what we say now already. This is for major releases, not individual builds. > > Ian. > > -- > Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] > Latest Project http://locut.us/ > Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/ > > _______________________________________________ > devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/zX4KCDjlgrA/ ICTHUS.
msg06552/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
