On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 12:51:13AM +0100, Frank v Waveren wrote: > Since this looks like it could well turn into a poll thread, I'd just > like to say I agree with Matthew, the more modular you make it, the > better. Even at the cost of performance, though I doubt it'll be that > bad, performance-wise.
Nobody is disagreeing as to whether modularity is a good thing. The disagreement is whether modularily can only be achieved by forcing separation between modules by running them in different JVMs. Clearly that is rediculous. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://locut.us/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/
msg06664/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
