On Monday 17 February 2003 03:49 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:36:34AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > hello list... > > > > i wonder why the insertion of a file with key CHK@ (automatically > > generate the chk value) results different CHK-keys when inserted with fcp > > and with fproxy > > > > these two different metadata headers of course produce different CHK@s > > due do different metadata, but the data itself is the same > > You have answered your own question. The client we provide, java > freenet.client.cli.Main (which uses FCP), will (hopefully) produce > identical keys to what fproxy produces. > > perhaps a checkbox in the web-frontend "create fcp compatible keys" or > > "don't add additional metadata" would suffice for user interaction. > > Um, no. FCP clients (*COUGH* FROST *COUGH*) should provide the > appropriate metadata. I have no idea what the point is of > Info.Description=file is though.
There are lots of legitimate reasons for CHK's to be inserted without metadata; in fact it's usually the better case. I wouldn't mind seeing fproxy be able to do this without hassle. _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
