On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:28:42AM -0600, Glenn Crocker wrote:
> 
> I've got a clean install of 561 that has been running for 20 hours.  I set
> the announce delay to 3000 to speed things up, and have downloaded a bunch
> of stuff.  I haven't done any deliberate key insertions, but I think my FEC
> download may have inserted missing blocks.  I have 50 node references and
> the "client" side of Freenet seems to be up and working well.
> 
> My node has announcedTo Events=9, Value Change=20 (for the day).  I have a
> lot of log entries like "Announcement failed to a292 2a5a a443 18ea 6666
> b287 4f78 80bb 1642 050e at depth 2."  And I have 49 incoming key requests.

Have you seen ANY successful announcements?
> 
> Question:  What causes announcements to fail?
Lots of things. But if your node is receiving some incoming requests...
and some successful incoming connections (check the diagnostics), that
eliminates most things...
> 
> In loadStats, I have 28 entries and globalRequestsPerHour: 3881.625
localRequestsPerHour is what?
> 
> My concern is that when 0.5.1 launches there will be a LOT of nodes exactly
> like mine leeching from the network and bringing the big Freenet nodes to
> their knees.  It's possible (and I'd say hard to tell) that the network just
> "doesn't need" my node at this point, or maybe it's deliberate that nodes
> are integrated this slowly.
Yeah. If there is a big problem with announcement, we have serious
difficulties.
> 
> I'm using the node reference list the windows web installer defaults to.
> This seems like a key risk point for the release.  If it's getting the same
> 50 nodes for every new user, those 50 are going to be hurting.
Yeah, which is why it's closer to 150. However the Main.seedRoutingTable
method only uses the last 50... I have committed a fix for this to
unstable, but it needs some testing. Looking into my node logs...

SEC Feb 21, 2003 1:07:54 AM
(freenet.node.states.announcing.SendAnnouncement, FThread-1, MINOR):
Sending NodeAnnouncement 
failed: freenet.ConnectFailedException: Against peer DSA(e86a a3b4 c550
dcd4 7e99  3e2b b805 a245 4758 f590) @ 128.211.145
.133:2810 - Cannot connect to: 128.211.145.133:2810 (terminal)


SEC Feb 21, 2003 1:07:54 AM
(freenet.node.states.announcing.SendAnnouncement, FThread-1, MINOR):
Sending NodeAnnouncement 
failed: freenet.ConnectFailedException: Against peer DSA(19c3 eb47 b0fb
4ff4 28ac  978b 699b d9de 680a 7db4) @ chapweske.c
om:17215 - Cannot connect to: chapweske.com:17215 (terminal)


SEC Feb 21, 2003 1:07:54 AM
(freenet.node.states.announcing.SendAnnouncement, FThread-1, MINOR):
Sending NodeAnnouncement 
failed: freenet.ConnectFailedException: Against peer DSA(708f 4edd 8759
53b4 3f69  7fb1 57e9 d218 2e85 eb58) @ 68.45.166.1
15:6521 - Exceeded blocked connection limit: 1 for 68.45.166.115:6521
(terminal)

All three were in my ancient seednodes file. I was under the impression
that reannouncements caused by low traffic were sent to nodes from the
routing table... it would seem that this is not the case.
> 
> Question:  Is there anything that needs to be done to "spread the network
> out" during (or before) launch?
> 
> -glenn
> 

-- 
Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Full time freenet hacker.
http://freenetproject.org/
Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/1AmszPTmr3I/
ICTHUS.

Attachment: msg07010/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to