On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 12:48:35PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > Well, I am not sure why this would be useful, but if we were to do it, > the best bet might be BeanShell (www.beanshell.org) - this is actually > pretty cool generally, those that don't know of it might be interested > to take a look. > > Another possibility would be SISC (sisc.sf.net). This is a Java scheme > interpreter. It has the advantage that it was created by our very own > Scott Miller. > > Still, I really don't understand what this would be useful for.
We cannot allow javascript. The only scripting that can be done safely is server-side. Server-side scripting would allow what amount to dynamic web sites, for example search engines. > > Ian. > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 08:38:37PM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Sometime in the Freenet 0.5 series, it would be really useful to include > > some form of scripting. I believe if we include the interpreter in > > fproxy, or generally somewhere in the web interface code, and the code > > can only call methods that we provide, we can make it reasonably safe. > > So, we need some sort of virtual machine or interpreter that matches the > > above conditions. Is there a suitable javascript interpreter (which is > > license compatible with Freenet, so not Rhino)? Is there any possibility > > of loading java bytecode into a running JVM and isolating it from all > > methods except for one class that we provide? Anyone got code, > > experience, ideas? > > -- > > Matthew Toseland > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Full time freenet hacker. > > http://freenetproject.org/ > > Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://0.0.0.0:8889/HPhwJMG1iEE/ > > ICTHUS. > > > > -- > Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]|locut.us|cematics.com] > Latest Project http://locut.us/ > Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/ -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at ICTHUS.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
