> good morning, dave... > > well, one small thing to mention: > > the freenet.exe icon and the freenet-webinstall.exe icon (both first > 32x32) are slightly different. perhaps it is possible to give them the > same icon for the sake of corporate design?
I know, and this was 'almost deliberate'. My intentions were: a) Have a different icon for a 'monolithic' installer vs. a 'webinstaller'. b) Make the webinstaller as small a download as possible To achieve a) I used my original freenet icons as a basis for a single-frame 32x32x4-bit image, which for the webinstaller is just a picture of hops at reduced colordepth (was going to be a picture of hops with a "server" behind it but that didn't look convincing), and for the monolithic installer is hops in front of a shiny CD. I then reused the shiny-CD image at 16x16x4 for the application small icon. In total that's two icon frames taking up just 1.05KB of the webinstaller. The freenet.exe icons, including all 12 (I think) size and colordepth permutations (including up to 48x48x32-bit with alpha), are around 20.5KB (and the webinstaller is itself only 50KB!) What would people prefer - tiny webinstaller downloads or webinstallers with full 32-bit color (with alpha translucency) icons? (This is a serious question by the way, I'm happy to make the change if people want it) d _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
