Actually, I'm thinking no. For fun I tried reading that 'paper' (some ramblings in a university maths department forum board) and noticed that it was basically unconnected phrases and conjecture.
I also noticed that this Joshua Herman fellow has also replied to another post (in same board, in reply to a question asking about what does NP-Complete mean, in layman terms, please) with the following: [Laymans Terms [Basically take for example that all men are stupid ( a given) [Now take the Nash Equlibrium Point Theory. This is explained simplily as [5 women and 5 men when the most "attractive" woman comes along the other [players of the game don't go for her they go for the other women. Then you [take MY theorm which states that given 2 people that are in love with each [other their definition of each other is polymorphic (changes over time) [This proves the MLK theorm , the why don't we do it in the road theorm , [the glass onion theorm, and the love theorm. Huh? Polymorphic? "Changes over time"? come on .... d _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
