I don't mind standardizing to a widely-adopted API for network communication, provided that it can support the functionality we already have with FNP - I simply didn't understand why you were criticising FNP on the basis that it didn't support NAT circumvention where your proposal doesn't support it either, it just supports outsourcing the problem elsewhere - this is hardly a valid criticism of FNP.
Ian. -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Founder, Locutus http://locut.us/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
