On June 20, 2003 11:18 pm, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 09:34:50PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > On June 20, 2003 08:03 pm, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > I am not sure I see what this has to do with NGrouting exactly - am > > > I missing something? > > > > It adds/hooks together some of the needed infrastucture. The next thing > > for me to do is look at feeding the response time estimator class some > > info and seeing what sort of results we get from it. > > > > There is also quite a bit more stats on what is happening while routing. > > For instance we now track (but do not use) the normalized time for > > sucessful queries both globally and per node. This and the message > > success rates is a good judge on how well we are routing. > > Ok, are you comfortable with the algorithm I proposed for dealing with > connection failures and such-like?
For the most part yes. I will be asking question as I get into the details. > The whole idea of the NGrouting algorithm is to avoid alchemy, I am > somewhat concerned that you just checked in a whole bunch of alchemy - I > would rather start with something basic that conformed to the NGrouting > "way of doing things" and then add stuff from there - rigorously > justifying any alchemy if it is absolutely required. There is less alchemy in this than in the current CP stuff... > Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you just checked in Nothing checked in. I asked toad to look at the code first. Ed _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
