On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:05:28AM +0100, Toad wrote:
> The main argument put forward at the time was to prevent the network
> from dividing into islands, or to stitch it back together when they did
> form.

Yes, however there has never been a single known instance of this 
happening, either in real life, or in simulation, and frankly it seems 
fantastically unlikely in practice.  Even with a node that just as 50 
references, the liklihood against the network splitting in two would be 
(very very very roughly) about 1/2^50, or - in other words - 
1/1125899906842624.  Now, that would be assuming random 
interconnections, and if-anything, I suspect that Freenet would be even 
less likely than a randomly connected network to split in two.

Bottom line, the whole random routing thing was a solution to a problem 
that nobody ever observed, and in all liklihood - would never 
actually occur in practice.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Clarke                                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Coordinator, The Freenet Project              http://freenetproject.org/
Founder, Locutus                                        http://locut.us/
Personal Homepage                                   http://locut.us/ian/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to