On Friday 25 July 2003 19:34, Toad wrote: > > I still don't think it is a worthwhile tradeoff. There will always be > > cases such as NIM that will make sure you cannot defeat the problem > > completely, and the gain just doesn't seem that great. Where is is really > > deemed necessary, manual pre-caching using IFRAME tags and automated > > pre-caching using specifically designed software for the purpose are IMHO > > a better solution. Using archives simply isn't the correct tool for the > > job, as far as I can see. It is a very ugly exception to the way Freenet > > is supposed to work. > > One of TFE's few advantages is that it doesn't activelink everything. > TFEE on the other hand has one page per category. I would not want all > the sites linked from TFEE to be precached on my node via HTML or via > other means.
I completely agree. But with allowing for things like the active link, the main page, and up to 1 MB of the rest of the site to be pre-cached via an archive in exactly this fashion, isn't that precisely what would be achieved? Gordan _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
