-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Tom Kaitchuck wrote: | Please bare in mind that Zips are already reducing this bandwidth to | about 23% of what it once was, and that space wise, this is a small | part of Freenet's content. Is is taking this number down to 19% worth | all the extra effort it would take?
I don't think it'll be worth it. Stick to the compression algorithm that's readily available in Java. Focus the scarce development resources on things that can really make a difference, e.g. routing. Once the core functionality is okay, you can start looking at these kind of optimizations.
Menno -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/KX5x9m/IbJq4o8sRAtmgAJ901BnCUCl9a5xCa7y7d+5rzMrtiACfTChY lHZvoGMw1DTs0cvoiCoLom0= =8gI2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
