On Monday 04 August 2003 11:49 am, Jay Oliveri wrote:
> D. This is unnecessary complexity if its to be woven into Fred. Expecting
> *all* client writers to somehow implement this scheme without first
> standardizing and perhaps even adding to the FCP spec is unreasonable
> (fcptools may insert content, but another client program may retrieve it
> besides fproxy).
>
> We can't insulate ourselves from basic ignorance if someone is inserting
> highly compressable content into Freenet uncompressed. And being that the
> main obstacle to Freenet is routing, this seems off target.
Agreed on both points. D. Leave archive support in fproxy though.
--
"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they go by."
- Douglas Adams
Nick Tarleton - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGP key available
_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
