On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:37:47AM -0400, lowmagnet wrote:
> 
> I saw the same issue in 6181 or 2.. I should have reported it.

Try 6185.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:10:45PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > Some interesting recent node behaviour: around build 6183, I left the
> > node overnight, when I came back the web interface was nonresponsive.
> > Not so unusual sadly. BUT, when I checked the logs, there was absolutely
> > no sign of the connection. No mention of LocalNIOInterface and no sign
> > of LSL accepting a connection on 127.0.0.1, despite my telnetting in to
> > 7888 and sending a basic HTTP request. But it was accepting connections
> > on the FNP interface, albeit at a relatively slow rate. My conclusion is
> > perhaps there IS a problem with LSL readiness selection, so rather than
> > bother with fixKeys, I'm going to make it iterate over all
> > serversockets (since there are only 4 of them and the logic is safe
> > against it).

> -Lowmagnet (Eli Sarver) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +---------------------------------------------------------+
>  Remember, information security begins with you. 
>  Help combat terrorism by encrypting your communications! 
> 
>  Public Key <http://lowmag.net/~lowmagnet/public.key/>
>  Web <http://lowmag.net/> | NOYFB, P 
> +---------------------------------------------------------+
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to