On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, J wrote: > All these grand dreams of these networks interacting are fine and all, but in > reality, the best option IMO is to develop all of these systems independantly > and let the best one win. The fastest, most stable and most secure system will > eventually become the most popular ... probably. The rest should dwindle.
Like if Betamax-net is better than VHS-net, Betamax-net will win? *g* > I definately don't want to see any development time put towards making these > different networks interoperate. I believe Toad's time is best utilized making > Freenet the best system for the job. Well... unless making Freenet interoperate advances Freenet's goals. It's about advancing the goals of the project, right? Not advancing "Freenet" per se. Just a thought. -todd _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
