>On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 06:06:24PM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: >> This shouldn't happen, should it? Is that 200 ms wait necessary anymore >> (wasn't it fixed with the LD_ASSUME_KERNELXX workaround)?
>I don't think so. And even if it was, there is no harm done. No harm done removing or keeping? If the construct might cause IllegalMonitorStateExceptions (due to whatever reason) I'd say that there is a slight harm keeping it... /N _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
