Has the decreasing upstream bw usage over time improved with more recent builds? Has anyone _not_ bwlimiting in freenet had problems with OOMs? I am of the belief that there is a slow memory leak in bwlimiting on heavily loaded nodes.
--Brandon On Sat, 09/27/03 at 23:28:53 -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > As you probably read in the "Decreasing upstream bandwidth over time in > 6205" thread, I've been having the same kind of problem. (note: I am > now using 6209) > > It turns out that my QueriesPerHour is very high, like Salah's, although > mine averages around 80,000. I've altered my freenet.ini as follows: > > # The maximum number of outgoing connections established per > maxRequestsInterval. > maxRequestsPerInterval=3000 > > I'll let you know what happens. > > -Martin > > Salah Coronya wrote: > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Brandon Low wrote: > >| Threadlimits probably aren't the issue any more, can you check how many > >| queries per minute your node is accepting? There is a default in the > >| config file to only accept a max of 300 queries per minute, is it > >| possible that that is the limit you are hitting? > > > >* entries: 100 > >* Global mean traffic (queries per hour):13030.233333333334 > >* Local mean traffic (queries per hour): 93798.85356956748 > >* Current advertise probability: 0.02 > >* Current proportion of requests being accepted: 0.0 > > > >Sure looks like it. Local mean traffic (the number of incoming requests > >to me?) seem to vary from about 30,000 an hour to 90,000 an hour. Seems > >to be holding at about 60,000. > > > >I'll reverting back to 120 threads and increase maxRequestsPerInterval > >and see what happens. > > > <SNIP> > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
