On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:35:08PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > Line 160: > > double pNotConnectFailedOrSearchFailed = > (1 - pConnectFailed) * (1- pSearchFailed); > > My high-school math is a bit rusty, but shouldn't that be: > > ... = 1-(pConnectFailed+pSearchFailed);
Well, thinking about it what is there is: not(connectFailed) and not(searchFailed) My suggested correction was: not (connectFailed or searchFailed) Which, if I am not mistaken, is the same thing. So n/m. Ian. -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Weblog http://slashdot.org/~sanity/journal _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
