On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:37:24AM +1000, fish wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:54:37AM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 18:53:04 -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > > > > > If I have faulty hardware, how am I supposed to tell? I'm not having > > > any problems with other applications (one of which is memory intensive). > > > > http://www.memtest86.com/ > > > > Run it for several hours (if you can). > > it should be pointed out, that on systems with more than about 128meg of ram, > memtest86 is actually completly useless, because it cannot do the required > amounts of tests on a current system within even a week. There is a big long > explanation, but basically, because we don't have maps of the way the ram > is internally layed out, it has to do tests that run in 2^n time, where n > is the amount of ram yoou have. > > as n gets bigger... well, you know...
Works fine here. Takes ~ an hour per pass (not with ALL tests enabled). 1GB RAM, XP 2800+, DDR 2700CL2.5 RAM. > > > -- jj > > -- > I'm sick and fucking tired of not getting people drunk. > -- blixco, http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/8/20/105121/869 -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
