On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 18:52, Tracy R Reed wrote: > The developers need to decide whether freenet is ready for general use or > not. They have led a lot of people to have some expectation of usefulness > despite the fact that it is clearly alpha software yet they have a release > called "stable".
In recent times, freenet has performed far better than it is now > I suspect part of the problem is major bugs in > implementation compounded by lack of testing and scientific method in > diagnosing bugs (ie. running NGR and older stuff). But others disagree. :) > > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:27:41PM +1300, David McNab spake thusly: > > Hi, > > > > It's not just me - lots of people are noticing this, that Freenet's > > reliability has dropped to an all-time low. > > > > On my FProxy page, I'm only seeing 1 or 2 out of the 5 activelinks at > > any time. > > > > In tests with others via IIP, keys inserted at HTL 25 are simply not > > retrievable on the other end. > > > > Is this possibly related to the mix of NGR and older nodes on the > > network? > > > > Can anyone offer a prognosis, and/or possible timeframe in which we > > might see some healing? > > > > -- > > Cheers > > David > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devl mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > -- Cheers David _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
