6223 definitely seems better than 6222. But, I did get an error and stack dump soon after starting it. See attached.

-Martin
Oct 7, 2003 1:34:54 PM (freenet.PeerPacketMessage,  write interface thread, ERROR): 
notifySuccess on [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:DataRequest{Close=false,Sustain=false,DataLength=0,{HopsToLive=11,Source.signature=69762125238f120bd723448f0e81d38e5a96490a,b05b01b7e37b7ae045f62e6569e363994dafcccb,Source.version=Fred,0.6,1.46,6223,Source.identityFP=5009
 9943 6aed a3e1 f4c7  f7d1 50f4 36c1 001b 
645f,Source.presentations=1,Source.ARK.encryption=db349f269f11233050a78614700908cd839ea3c374292aecc2c6fc1754d368df,Source.ARK.revision=1,Source.sessions=1,Source.physical.tcp=216.103.210.58:18715,SearchKey=2d2152369df1b78d3bfe714350c4599a43a68563140302,UniqueID=9b9d2dff9caccd88,}}:[EMAIL
 PROTECTED]@9b9d2dff9caccd88,true@ 
1065558894046:1065558893546:false:freenet.SendFailedException: Against peer DSA(37f6 
af51 c22c 7055 8c77  480e b50d 21b7 9b43 629c) @ 65.110.252.197:46689 - Sent 0 bytes 
(513 of packet in notifyDone (nonterminal):freenet.Message: DataRequest @null @ 
9b9d2dff9caccd88 already finished!
java.lang.Exception: debug
        at freenet.PeerPacketMessage.notifySuccess(PeerPacketMessage.java:100)
        at freenet.PeerPacket.jobDone(PeerPacket.java:122)
        at freenet.ConnectionHandler.jobDone(ConnectionHandler.java:1118)
        at 
freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.processConnections(WriteSelectorLoop.java:680)
        at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:642)
        at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.run(WriteSelectorLoop.java:736)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to