On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:13:13PM +0100, Toad wrote: > > You can treat it the same as the node returning DNF (which nodes to which > > you route can do anyway), there will still be more of a bias to routing > > that area of the keyspace to the node that actually specialises in it than > > to other nodes. > Okay, so they'd be "punished" in the estimators - the probability of DNF > for a given key would be updated on the graph? Yes. I can't imagine this being a big deal, as a same request in the current system with a HTL that would make it end without looping would punish that node too.
-- Frank v Waveren Fingerprint: 21A7 C7F3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]|stack.nl|dse.nl] ICQ#10074100 1FF3 47FF 545C CB53 Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7BD9 09C0 3AC1 6DF2 _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
