On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:31:01PM -0700, Reskill wrote: > >Run your own fork of freenet if you like, but you will not be able > >to > >enforce everyone running recent stable builds, and if you succeed > >in > >getting 90% of users onto it, development will suffer. > > > >-- > >Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > > Can I just clear something up here - there�s something I don't quite > understand. > > Who are you developing freenet for? Are you developing it for the users > of freenet, or are you developing it for Ians personal research project? > I'd really like to know. Of course development will "suffer" (i.e. you'll > have to work a little bit harder, see my flog, if you can retrieve it), > but the freenet user base will have a vastly improved experience and > might actually be able to do something with this resource hogging bandwidth > monching piece of software. > > I thought you were developing freenet for the users... hence donations... > but I'm obviously wrong.
Of course I am developing it for the users. And if we are unable to test all the core stuff that makes freenet go, and in which serious problems will only show up when deployed widely, that will ultimately be bad for the users. > > --Reskill -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
