On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:09:28PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have an idea. > > The datastore does pcaching on all data that goes through your node and does not > know whether or not it was you that requested the data. Then have a second datastore > that cache all of your data requests this should be encrypted. However because there > is no way of guaranteeing that the key does not get swapped out, advice people to do > this at an OS level as well. (IE: keep your cache on a rubberhose partition) However > when you request a multipart file, you use premix routing to make all the data > requests come through a single node that does not know you. Then it should store all > the data that you requested in it's second cache too (and probabilistically in the > first). That way, even if someone is able to perform a timing analysis on your first > cache, they have no way of knowing whether it was you or someone that connected to > you that downloaded the data. (Also it should be quite hard to pull off because it > is always probabilistic). > > Then they break down your door and steal your computer, and you are unfortunate and > at the time some of the keys were swapped out and written on the disk (any you > weren�t prudent enough to use a secondary encryption tool), they can read some of > your cache, but they still can't prove that it was actually you that requested the > data.
Isn't that what I said? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
