Hmm... it was on the CVS mailing list... thought toad wrote it here, but guess he did not. The unstable build is unstable for a reason, and I believe that it was a decision of both Sanity and Toad to do this fork to basically force people on unstable to take part in the testing they are volunteering to take part in by running a build marked stable.
The point is that we just don't know if NGR is working till we have a sizable number of people using an NGR only network. I hope that you will stick with us at least through the next stable release, after that if it doesn't work, I can't really ask you to stay any longer. --Brandon On Thu, 10/23/03 at 02:05:23 +0200, Matthias wrote: > Brandon Low schrieb: > > >Read before writing. > > Where has this been written, I don't see it the page or the mailing lists. > > >6266 and greater are designed to use a separate network to test > >NGRouting's behaviour when it isn't sharing network space with > >non-ngrouting. > > Fine, but why didn't it get an new file on the snapshots page. My update > script just downloaded the new freenet-unstable-latest.jar and my node is > down again. Nothing I could do about it. :( > > Maybe it is time to totally take my node down for a year or so, there are > other, there are other ways to use the box which I currently donated to > fred. > > >--Brandon > > Greets Matthias > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
