-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi,
I agree with "digital ch". I run a permanent freenet-node since over a year
now cause we really need something to stop the growing of total supervision.
The switch to a devel-network without really giving informations out isn't the
first big mistake we where able to see last weeks and one more time I lost my
routingtable. Cause I'm a developer too I don't have the time to check daily
the freenet-mailinglists and seek through the commits to note that the fine
working unstable Build 6265 was _replaced_ with a devel-network. There are
reasons why the word "compatibility" and "branch" should contain together!
Till yesterday the unstable branch was compatible with the previous unstables
(and if not, then cause it's unstable :-). But why the hell it was
intentionaly made to be incompatible? Why the fork wasn't done as fork? Means
something like opening a "freenet-devel"-branch...
Anyway, I stopped my node now and wiped the store. Hopefully the situation
will get fixed and will be more user-friendly in future that I'm able to be a
part again without having to spend so much time with reading the mailinglists
to get really important user-infos. Thanks.
- --
ca
dipesh aka Sebastian Sauer
s{windows}{linux}gm; //just another fixed pain in the (gl)ass
GPG-key: http://www.dipe.org/public_key.asc
Fingerprint: 8F1E 219B 16E6 4EC7 29CC F408 E193 65E2 9134 2221
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/l7WF4ZNl4pE0IiERAprPAKDfziSWGVZ9k6v/3/846vN+xCJRTwCfcryX
OefANtu12QRxkYkLaywtqsA=
=g9uO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
