--- Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:12:55PM +0200, Some Guy wrote: > > Was NGR tested as extensively as freenet's original routing? If not then why? > > > > You could have reused some of the same code from the first freenet paper. Even > > now this > might > > still be a good idea. Sorry if you guys have done this and I haven't heard, but I > > never was > all > > that convinced by NGR. > > Nope. Ian was dazzled by its beauty. But the main problem was that it's > virtually impossible to simulate NGRouting.
Hmmmm, dazzled by its beauty eh. I don't see why testing it would be any harder than testing the old routing as was done in the freenet paper(freenet.pdf 1999). For the paper the simulated 1000 nodes. They didn't have move actual data around. The NG 10 points seems like less state per node to simulate than the old system. Boy it sounds like I'm volunteering aren't I! I'm not as dazzled by its beauty though. Still if nobody has time to do this, maybe I should. Is there any interest in writing a paper about NG as for the original routing? Does anyone else think this is a good idea??? __________________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Logos und Klingelt�ne f�rs Handy bei http://sms.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
