> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niklas Bergh > Sent: den 4 november 2003 10:58 > To: 'Discussion of development issues' > Subject: RE: [freenet-dev] Interesting statistics and anecdotes > > > Maybe we should keep an pQR estimator in the routingtable?! > We don't have to use it for anything but it would be > interesting to be able to display graph. > > /N
The topic says it really.. Which of the estimators will be affected by the fact that we tried to fetch data from one of our Peers but didn't since we where QRd? ---Probability of DNF--- We didn't get a DNF so this one probably shouldn't be affected ---Time for DNF--- Ditto ---Time for successful search--- We didn't manage to do a 'successful search' so this one should't be affected ---Transfer rate--- Ditto I just read the source and there seems to be two DecayingRunningAverage that are affected by the fact that a node QRs. But.. Do they have impact enough? And is it really correct behaviour of a node to assume that a node that QR:d was doing it only temporarily? Maybe it would be better to use something else than a DecayingRunningAverage? /N _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
