Toad wrote:This strongly suggests that routing is not doing terribly great. The
I don't refuse to admit the possibility, I just think that it is unlikely and that there are much more likely explanations (such as
The problem could be that many of them simply aren't receiving enough individual data to generalize effectively. This could be addressed in at least two ways:
* Reduce the number of peers from 50 to, say, 15 or even 10
I can't believe my eyes! Reduce the number of peers ?!! That is dangerously close to acknowledging the 'issue' of 500+ simultaneous network connections :) Or doesn't it bother anyone else ? Without any simulations or math to support myself, I suspect that the "best" number of peers, for a given host, is likely to vary in relation to that node's key primary network characteristics: throughput and latency .
Ken
(I took the above quotes slightly out of context, please forgive)
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
