On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Thomas Themel wrote: > Hi, > Ed Tomlinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-11-19: > > Problem is that all the flies can enter the swamp but they can only leave > > through a couple small tubes. The flies breed and the frogs and fish cannot > > eat them fast enough so lots of them queue at the exit tubes. > > I don't quite get the vermin analogy... Could you find one that uses > queries, QRs and messages? :) > > > The request success ratios are great, often over 0.25, but the routing > > success ratios only 0.02 over the same period. Interestingly looking > > at the outputbyte counters I am using 95% of my available bandwidth > > and over 80% of that is to send trailers. > > Exactly. I have what I believe to be extremely bad routingSuccessRatio > lately. > > | 11/13/03 12:00:00 AM CET | 54392 | 1194 | 0.021951757611413443 | > |---------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------| > | 11/14/03 12:00:00 AM CET | 90193 | 812 | 0.009002915969088511 | > |---------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------| > | 11/15/03 12:00:00 AM CET | 170186 | 597 | 0.0035079266214612247 | > |---------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------| > | 11/17/03 12:00:00 AM CET | 241395 | 415 | 0.0017191739679777956 | > |---------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------------------| > | 11/18/03 12:00:00 AM CET | 526215 | 257 | 4.883935273604895E-4 | > > > So its serving requests using all the bandwidth I give it but they are > > mostly from the DS. Does this imply that with small bandwidth limits > > we also want a small DS or that we should limit the max file size stored > > on a node to depending on output bandwidth? > > I have a 10G data store that currently is 5.6G on disk. Perhaps this is > indeed oversized for the ISDN link.
I don't think that should be possible... > > On a related note, I'm thinking of moving the node to a DSL uplink for > the rest of the month (I've only got 20GB to waste per month on the DSL > link, and that takes my node about 10 days). Does anyone care to predict > whether it will adjust to the new situation quickly enough for the speed > increase to be useful, and whether it will adjust to the meagre > bandwidth when switching it back? If doing this is bad, that might be > part of my node's problems - I've switched it between ISDN and DSL a few > times in the past few months. Have you tried the average bandwidth limiting settings? > > > Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 509 (452/57/512) > > Connections transferring (Transmitting/Receiving) 21 (15/6) > > Data waiting to be transmitted/received/sending 7,317 KiB/1,181 KiB/498 KiB > > Interesting. I remember seeing that, but when I look in my 6339 > Connection Manager, it's back to the less informative > > | Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 299 (199/100/2048) > | Connections transferring (Transmitting/Receiving) 40 (12/28) > | Data waiting to be transfered 42 MiB > | Total amount of data transferred 134 MiB > > What build are the verbose stats from? > > ciao, > -- > [*Thomas Themel*] one with nintendo > [extended contact] halcyon symbiosis > [info provided in] hand thinks for itself > [*message header*] -- D. A. Koronakos and B. Roberts; "High-tech Haikus" > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
