On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote: > Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I do now. However, it is a way that a node could hurt the network > > without being proportionately punished for it in the estimators - if I > > reinstate it, then nodes that QR with HTL 0, killing the request, will be > > treated the same as nodes that QR at any other HTL. This seems very bad. > > It's bad, but only very mildly. Evil nodes can kill request at will; > just DNF.
Sure. But if they do this, they will be punished in their estimators. On the other hand, QRs are in the current thinking pretty bad, and are punished quite heavily anyway (backoff). > > Thelema > -- > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raabu and Piisu > GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7 84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
