On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:26:41PM +0000, Ian Clarke wrote: > Toad wrote: > >Load balancing and routing are inseparable in their effects. Routing > >can't work if it can't route to close to its first choice. HOWEVER it > >seems to be managing this mostly - the stats suggest we typically route > >to our second choice, which is a lot better than it used to be. > > Ed claims that his node is accepting about 10% of requests, if true, and > his node is typical, then it is unlikely that most nodes get to route to > their second preference.
Do you think we need more NIO work on trailers etc? It would seem that nodes accept a bunch of trailers and then overload for a while on threads - so effectively we DO have a bandwidth based QR, it's just a delayed effect. This may be bad for routing... > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
