I know that may not seem straight forward. But I didn't come up with this proposial in an hour. I spent a long time thinking about the problems with the network, and decided that time, rather than HTL was the way to go. as did you. That presented a lot of problems too. (and security issues) The way I worked out how to solve them was to use trust as a means of deturmaning time.
Read my proposial, it is simple, and easy to impliment, and does both. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >>> Postitive Trust == GNUnet modle. My proposial impliments both. > >> > <snip> > >>> Martin Stone Davis wrote: > >> You'll also have to answer the question I had about GNUnet-style > >> economic models: what crucial problem would be solved that wouldn't > >> be solved by the plan I outlined > >> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/8191)? > > > > > > I could ask you the same question. The bottom line is that my > > proposal is a very easy way of implementing exactly what you > > describe. > > I'm confused. You said your proposal was equivalent to implementing a > GNUnet-style model on Freenet. You are also saying it's a way of doing > what Toad described. But Toad's idea != GNUnet-style model. All Toad > is saying is to use time-to-live rather than hops-to-live. That's just > one part of your proposal. > > -Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
