On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 08:37:11PM +0100, Aureliano Rama wrote: > > Also, I'd really like to test the black hole in stable as well; it should be > > much less potent, but the never-QR-ing element is still there. > > Sincerely, i think this would be pointless. > > We already know that old stuff is subject to that attack. That anyone > can bring freenet down even with low resources. > And this is why we need to bring on unstable development: to replace > stable some day. And then stable flaws will be gone in the wind.
I don't think it is. Old stable is vulnerable to lots of things but not that particular attack afaics. > > We already got protest in support list for your BH that, as i > answered, was needed to debug. > > But if don't let users something that can be used, what the need to > fork out the stable was? > > We need Joe User happy, to make his donation come in. > > > Aureliano Rama > Corso di Laurea in Informatica, Pisa > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
