Ouch, I think the amount of discussion about achieving large-file download through a web interface is pretty good evidence of how cumbersome and time-consuming it is likely to be to code, which was my main concern with it.

I would encourage us to focus on more immediate issues, we have a funding crunch coming up in a few weeks and unless we have something to demonstrate to the world for all our talk of 0.7, I fear we may have trouble paying Matthew his next instalment :-(

Ian.

On 2 Sep 2005, at 14:27, Matthew Toseland wrote:

Could be natively supported by the browser... you want to talk to the
mozilla folks about it?

On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 02:25:14PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote:

Matthew Toseland wrote:


Would probably confuse the client... Can you test this?


No luck. Firefox won't send new requests in response to 4xx codes, and it will only send up to 20 requests per page in response to 3xx codes.

I suppose another possibility would be to create a simple "out-of- order" file format, which could be shared with other p2p networks that support out-of-order downloads. The file starts with a 64-bit length field, and
each chunk is prefixed with a 64-bit length and a 64-bit offset. It's
pretty trivial to reassemble files, detect incomplete files and resume downloads, and the inconvenience for users is no worse than downloading
a ZIP archive.

Cheers,
Michael

--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to