Well the point IIRC was that we don't need NIO in Freenet 0.7. That post was asking if we should use NIO anyway for a few non-critical things (the proposed optional TCP transport, fproxy, FCP), in which case we might need to debug classpath NIO. Fred 0.7 should work on Kaffe now as far as I know but I haven't tried it.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 03:45:13PM +0200, Emanuele Olivetti wrote: > Hi, > What about next major release Freenet 0.7 and Kaffe/GCJ? > > On http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/16645 > (nearly one month ago) Toad says about Kaffe-Classpath NIO: > "There has been loads of work done on it, but it still doesn't fully > work. It may be worth putting some time into debugging it, if we intend > to use it.". > > Are there more detailed news about running next freenet on something > different from Sun JRE 1.4.x-1.5? > > Thanks, > > E. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
