On Friday 13 June 2008 10:55, Michael Rogers wrote: > Florent Daignière wrote: > > * Michael Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-13 00:44:13]: > > > >> Matthew Toseland wrote: > >>> Interesting paper, tends to back up the assumptions we've been making > >>> mostly... I'm not sure how much it directly applies to those trying to use > >>> darknet cell networks though... > >> I guess we could use fproxy warnings to encourage people to use the > >> clique/delegation defences: "You have more than 50 darknet friends. To > >> prevent the network from becoming over-reliant on your node, please > >> encourage some of your friends to connect to each other." > >> > > > > We already have such a warning :) > > Good to know we're ahead of the cutting-edge research. ;-)
Well it doesn't exactly say that, it could probably be improved:
This node has too many connections (${count} > ${max}). Adding large numbers
of nodes automatically does not produce a small-world topology, hurts
routing, and risks producing single points of failure.
pgpaG6yym9qie.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
