On Thursday 26 June 2008 03:26, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:16 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author: toad > > Date: 2008-06-25 20:16:53 +0000 (Wed, 25 Jun 2008) > > New Revision: 20715 > > > > Modified: > > branches/db4o/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/SingleBlockInserter.java > > Log: > > More activation > > > > IMHO, we are modifying too many classes for this. > Have you look at the bytecode instrumentation TA in db4o 7.x?
I need the db4o collections, 7.x makes them deprecated. Apart from that, using the stable code is IMHO reasonable. Only the client layer is being affected by activation, deactivation, database updating etc.
pgpUWrNegTMEx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
