On Tuesday 02 June 2009 09:22:13 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > On Thursday 21 May 2009 17:32:55 Juiceman wrote: > >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Zero3 <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Matthew Toseland skrev: > >>>> On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:41:00 Zero3 wrote: > >>>>> Matthew Toseland skrev: > >>>>>>> Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at > >>>>>>> least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be > >>>>>>> registered in the registry next to the .exe path we are checking > >>>>>>> already > >>>>>>> for the individual browsers. We can also check the version info of > >>>>>>> .exes > >>>>>>> as an alternative (most Windows applications are compiled with various > >>>>>>> static info like version and author). The Windows launcher is already > >>>>>>> running Chrome with a command line argument making it start in privacy > >>>>>>> mode btw. > >>>>>> You should prioritise Chrome with privacy mode over Firefox without it. > >>>>> Agreed: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3118. > >>>> I thought you had already done this? > >>> At time of writing, no. But since then I managed to figure git out and > >>> changed it (hence the bug is now "resolved"). > >>> > >>> ... which leads to another thing to consider: We need to make it > >>> possible to update the start.exe/stop.exe/freenetlauncher.exe files for > >>> existing users when new updates are made available. > >>> > >>> The easiest way to do this right now would probably be to add them to > >>> the update.cmd script. > >>> > >>> - Zero3 > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Devl mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > >>> > >> I would be happy to do this, however I will need a defined directory > >> structure on the download site, with known file names. Like we have > >> the .url link for the freenet.jar. I believe I can use the .sha1 file > >> to check for updates if you want to have a static name. ie > >> wrapper_win32x86.exe etc. Also I would prefer to not have them inside > >> a zip unless we have have a built-in unzipping program in Windows I > >> can reliably call by command line. Otherwise we will have to bundle > >> yet another third party utility. > > > > Well, they should be fetched from > > http[s]://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/<filename>, not from > > downloads... are the relevant files currently available from checksums? > > I don't know if they are? I never had anything to do with the actual > uploading of the files to anywhere on freenetproject.org.
I do ... what files exactly do you need? Note that we may need to change from https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/filename to some other domain at some point, but we can hopefully do that by changing the update scripts.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
