No, it's fine. APT does automatic verification of signatures. We can publish
the key over HTTPS, or to a keyserver. It also lets you configure automatic
updates.
X
On 01/08/10 15:40, Romain Dalmaso wrote:
This is risky. Unlike updating over the freenet network, it's not
secure at all and it's not automatic.
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Ximin Luo<[email protected]> wrote:
On 31/07/10 18:32, Matthew Toseland wrote:
The fundamental, irresolvable problem with worrying about the FHS is that
we
need to be able to update our own executable code. Hence Freenet is
installed under a single user, binaries, logs, and everything else. This
is
true now by accident or design on unix, and it will be true on Windows
very
soon as well because of nasty installer issues with trying to make it a
service.
I can go set up a freenet APT repository, it's really simple and requires no
extra daemon, just static HTTP files. (After we get this directory structure
sorted out and some build-deb scripts, of course.) That will take care of
the auto-update issue on Debian and Ubuntu.
X
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
