On Tuesday 03 August 2010 09:50:05 am xor wrote: > On Friday 30 July 2010 01:05:30 am Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Any suggestions for what we should link to? It looks like both TUFI and > > the Activelink Index sites have not been updated recently? Criteria: A > > site must be useful for finding stuff on Freenet. It must be easy to use > > and ideally have descriptions. It must not be likely to lead newbies to > > places where they don't want to go without warning them i.e. it must must > > clearly label evil content. > > > > We are #2 on Sourceforge's "What's Hot" for security on Linux. And we're > > consistently rising at the moment. Have I missed a significant press > > article? > > Quoting from a Freetalk thread called: > "Who do I have to kill to get on the front page?" > At the moment I don't filter the links, just the ActiveLinks, so you > don't > accidentally download any kiddie porn via an AL, but I can do a filtered > version of the site if required, removing all the porn. I could perhaps
The non-activelink version looks better. I will tell him via Freetalk that he should provide a version of the non-activelink site which does not provide child porn so we can add it to the default bookmarks.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
